It is one of the most common patterns we see among brands that reach out: one or two creators drive most of the sales. Everything works fine as long as they keep posting. The day one of them slows down, changes direction, or moves to a competitor, revenue follows the same curve straight down.

Why concentration on a handful of creators is risky

An affiliate program built around a small number of profiles is not a strategy. It is a dependency. It works as long as nothing changes, but it does not survive even a minor disruption, a temporary dip in a creator's visibility, a disagreement over commission, simple creative fatigue.

Build a broad base rather than a few pillars

The goal is not to multiply partnerships at random, but to build a large enough and diverse enough creator base that no single one of them accounts for a critical share of revenue. In practice that means three levers:

The right metric is not the number of active creators, but the share of revenue carried by the top performing one. If it exceeds a third, the dependency is already there.

Commission is not the only lever

Many brands only negotiate the commission rate. It is a lever, but not the strongest one. Category exclusivity, early access to new products, or a tiered commission system based on performance are often more effective at retaining a good creator without inflating acquisition cost.

If your current program relies on a handful of profiles, that is usually the first thing we fix. Let's talk about it.